Back to Capabilities

Remediation methods guide

Every remediation method Nelson uses, and where each fits in a site assessment.

A site assessment tells you what is in the ground, where it sits and what it must meet. This guide lists the methods Nelson delivers across its thermal, In-Situ and Earthworks divisions, and the assessment findings that point toward each one.

3 divisions
Thermal, In-Situ and Earthworks
30+ years
Hydrocarbon remediation delivery
On site
Mobile thermal fleet brought to the material

How to read this guide

The assessment decides the method.

A Phase II environmental site assessment, or its equivalent, establishes the contaminants, their concentrations, the soil and groundwater conditions, the land use and the criteria that apply. Each of those findings narrows the options. The methods below are grouped by where the contamination is and what has to happen to it.

Most sites use more than one method. A common pattern is excavating the accessible source for on-site treatment, treating what remains under buildings or below the water table in place, and verifying everything against the same criteria.

Thermal treatment

When the soil can be excavated.

Mobile ex-situ thermal desorption: excavated soil is heated in a rotary dryer to drive off contaminants, which are destroyed in a thermal oxidizer before gas conditioning and baghouse polishing. Nelson's mobile thermal fleet runs direct-fired and indirect configurations. Assessment fit: petroleum hydrocarbons, BTEX, PAHs and other organics in soil that can be dug out, especially where haul distance is long or the treated soil is wanted back as fill.

High-temperature thermal destruction for PFAS: a pilot-validated program, including participation in the NATO STO PFAS test bed. Assessment fit: PFAS-impacted soil where destruction is preferred to containment, considered case by case at pilot and validation stage.

Specialty thermal streams: fly ash processing, biosolids treatment and tire reclamation by pyrolysis. Assessment fit: industrial residues identified in the waste characterization alongside or instead of contaminated soil.

In-situ treatment

When the contamination stays in place.

In-situ thermal treatment heats soil where it lies and captures the vapours for treatment above ground. Assessment fit: sources under buildings or utilities, at depth, or where excavation is impractical.

Soil vapour extraction (SVE), multi-phase vacuum extraction (MPE) and air sparging with thermal enhancement remove volatile contaminants from the unsaturated zone and groundwater. Assessment fit: volatile hydrocarbons or solvents in permeable soils, and free product on the water table for MPE.

Remedial injection: in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO), in-situ chemical reduction (ISCR), colloidal carbon permeable reactive barriers and bio-amendments, matched to the contaminant chemistry. Assessment fit: dissolved plumes and source zones of BTEX, PAHs and chlorinated solvents, and downgradient plume control.

Groundwater and water treatment: pump-and-treat systems, dewatering, containerized above-ground treatment and sediment management. Assessment fit: impacted groundwater or process water that has to be captured and treated before discharge.

High resolution site characterization (HRSC) sits upstream of all of these. Assessment fit: when the existing assessment leaves the source geometry uncertain, HRSC refines it before a remedy is designed.

Earthworks

When material has to move.

Excavation, certified haulage and disposal at approved facilities, with confirmation sampling support, clean backfill placement and site reclamation. Assessment fit: material outside a treatment envelope, small or scattered volumes, or sites where disposal is the practical route. Treatment and disposal are both legitimate offerings, and the choice follows the site.

Decommissioning, demolition and environmental construction, including landfill construction and decommissioning, pond decommissioning and barrier, seepage and erosion control systems. Assessment fit: structures or containment that must be removed or built before, during or after remediation.

Assessment finding to method

What the site assessment shows, and the methods it points to:

Hydrocarbon soil that can be excavatedMobile ex-situ thermal desorption, with treated soil verified and returned as fill where the criteria allow. Excavation and disposal for volumes or locations where treatment does not fit.

Source under a building, utility or at depthIn-situ thermal treatment, soil vapour extraction or remedial injection, chosen on soil permeability and contaminant type.

Dissolved plume in groundwaterRemedial injection (ISCO, ISCR, permeable reactive barrier), air sparging or pump-and-treat.

Free product on the water tableMulti-phase vacuum extraction, followed by in-situ or ex-situ treatment of the residual source.

PFAS-impacted soilCase-by-case evaluation through the pilot-validated thermal destruction program.

Uncertain source extentHigh resolution site characterization before committing to a remedy.

Structures, ponds or landfills on siteEarthworks decommissioning, demolition and environmental construction.

Project evidence

Methods in the field.

Tioga, North Dakota, one of the largest inland oil spills in US history1.2 million tonnes of hydrocarbon-impacted soil treated on site by mobile thermal remediation, with verified destruction efficiency and full on-site closure.

Bear Hills, Alberta, Louis Bull First Nation140,000 tonnes remediated on site. Treated material returned as engineered fill, with revegetation inside a single growing season. Named a Top 25 remediation project.

Vietnam, legacy dioxin residuesThermal treatment of legacy dioxin residues under the main contractor, one of the few programs executed at this scale in Southeast Asia.

NATO PFAS test bedSelected as a NATO PFAS test bed selection for PFAS-impacted military-base soil. Mobile high-temperature destruction sized to AFFF-driven contamination profiles.

The Hub

Contaminants we treat

Contaminant-by-contaminant pages set out behaviour, criteria and the treatment routes that apply.

Open the map

We'll reply within 1 business day.

Frequently asked

How is a remediation method chosen?
From the site assessment: the contaminants and concentrations, where they sit in soil or groundwater, soil type, access, land use and the criteria that apply. Nelson compares the options against those findings and the intended end use of the site.
Can one site use several methods?
Yes, and most do. Accessible source soil is often excavated and thermally treated on site while contamination under structures or in groundwater is treated in place.
What if my assessment is incomplete?
High resolution site characterization can fill the gaps before a remedy is designed. You can also send the reports you already have and Nelson will review them against the treatment options.
Does Nelson offer excavation and disposal?
Yes, through its Earthworks division, including certified haulage, disposal at approved facilities, confirmation sampling support and site reclamation.

Related

Capabilities, mobile fleet and process

In-situ technology

Thermal desorption soil remediation

Technology selection

Environmental site assessment, glossary

Upload your site documents

More from Nelson

  • Mobile thermal technology: configured for the material, brought to site
  • How to use The Hub for contamination research
  • Navigator: a practical guide to remediation strategy
  • The Ground Truth: Warren Nelson's remediation newsletter
  • A new era of enlightenment
  • Value should be the final outcome
  • What’s next at Nelson
  • Why independent research matters more than anything
  • Over thirty years of permanent outcomes: a field review of Nelson’s project record
  • Petroleum-contaminated soil treatment in the US: build the plan around the fuel profile
  • Contaminated soil management in the US: from excavation to an accepted destination
  • US remediation project evidence: what Tioga and Honolulu tell a project owner

Site Navigation

  • All Articles & Research
  • Thermal Remediation Capabilities
  • Project Case Studies
  • Remediation Glossary
  • About Nelson Environmental Remediation
  • Contact Nelson