Back to Capabilities
Stabilization and solidification
Soil stabilization and solidification, and when it is the honest answer.
Solidification locks contaminants into a solid matrix. Stabilization changes their chemistry so they stop moving. Both are legitimate remedies for the right contaminant, and both leave the contaminant in place, which is the trade-off to understand before specifying them.
Metals
Best-suited contaminant class
In place
Contaminant immobilized, not destroyed
Leach-tested
Performance proven by leachate results
What it is
Two different mechanisms, usually specified as one.
Solidification is physical. Binders, typically cementitious, are mixed into the soil to produce a monolithic mass with low permeability, so water cannot move through the material and pick up contaminant.
Stabilization is chemical. Reagents convert the contaminant into a less soluble, less mobile form, so even if water reaches it, very little leaves. Most real programs use both, which is why the remedy is written as S/S.
The trade-off
The contaminant is still there.
S/S changes the risk pathway rather than the inventory. That is entirely defensible for metals, which cannot be destroyed by any thermal process, and it is often the fastest, lowest-cost way to make a metals-impacted site safe.
It is a weaker choice for persistent organics. PFAS, dioxins, PCBs, and weathered hydrocarbons remain intact inside the monolith, and future land use, redevelopment, or a change in criteria can reopen the file. Where the contaminant can be destroyed, destruction ends the liability instead of managing it.
Selecting the remedy
Stabilization and solidification fits when:
The contaminant is a metalLead, arsenic, chromium, cadmium, and similar cannot be destroyed. Immobilization is the remedy, and S/S is the established route.
The risk is leaching to groundwaterWhere the exposure pathway is water moving through the material, cutting permeability and solubility addresses the actual risk.
Volumes are large and criteria are risk-basedUnder risk-based frameworks such as RBCA, an immobilized mass that passes leachate criteria can satisfy closure at a fraction of the cost of excavation.
Land use will not changeS/S depends on the monolith staying undisturbed. Sites headed for redevelopment or excavation are poor candidates.
It is paired, not substitutedOn mixed sites, organics are thermally destroyed and the metals fraction is stabilized. Applying one remedy to everything is where programs get reopened.
Project evidence
Related project evidence.
PCB gold mine, a Canadian firstOn-site thermal destruction of PCB-impacted material at a mine site, the first program of its kind in Canada.
Bear Hills, Alberta, Louis Bull First Nation140,000 tonnes remediated on site. Treated material returned as engineered fill, with revegetation inside a single growing season. Named a Top 25 remediation project.
Technology selection, evidence baseHow remedies are compared on end state, verification, and long-term liability rather than unit price alone.
The Hub
Contamination data by jurisdiction
The Hub maps known contamination across North America and sets out the criteria each jurisdiction applies to closure.
Open the map
We'll reply within 1 business day.
Frequently asked
What is soil solidification?
Soil solidification mixes binders, usually cementitious, into contaminated soil to form a low-permeability monolithic mass. Water cannot readily move through the material, so the contaminant is physically prevented from leaching, even though it remains present.
What is the difference between stabilization and solidification?
Solidification is a physical change: the material is bound into a solid, low-permeability mass. Stabilization is a chemical change: reagents convert the contaminant into a less soluble and less mobile form. Most programs apply both together and specify the remedy as S/S.
Which contaminants suit stabilization and solidification?
Metals such as lead, arsenic, chromium, and cadmium are the natural fit, because they cannot be destroyed by any treatment process. Persistent organics including PFAS, dioxins, PCBs, and weathered hydrocarbons are better addressed by thermal destruction, since S/S leaves them intact.
How is S/S performance verified?
By leachate testing on the treated material against the applicable regulatory limit, alongside strength and permeability testing where the specification requires it. The results, not the mix design, are what the regulator accepts.
Is stabilization permanent?
It is durable while the monolith stays undisturbed and the chemistry holds. It is not destruction: the contaminant inventory remains on site, so future excavation, land-use change, or tightened criteria can bring the file back.
Related
Stabilization and solidification, glossary
Soil remediation services
Thermal desorption soil remediation
Compare remediation techniques and technologies
Alberta Tier 1 and Tier 2 planning
Soil remediation services
RBCA, glossary
Contaminants we treat