Acid gas scrubbing
Burn a chlorinated, fluorinated, or sulfur-bearing feed and the halogens leave the combustion chamber as hydrogen chloride, hydrogen fluoride, and sulfur oxides. The scrubber is what removes them before the stack. On PCB, dioxin, and PFAS work it is not an accessory to the oxidiser, it is half the reason the system is permittable.
Where it sits
A thermal remediation train separates contaminant from soil in the desorber, destroys it in the thermal oxidiser, then has to deal with what destruction produces. Organic molecules containing chlorine or fluorine cannot simply disappear: the carbon leaves as carbon dioxide and the halogen leaves as acid gas. Sulfur-bearing feeds add SO2 and SO3.
The gas train therefore runs oxidiser, rapid quench, acid gas scrubbing, then particulate removal in a baghouse before the stack. Quench speed matters as much as scrubber capacity on chlorinated work, because slow cooling through roughly 400 to 200 degrees Celsius is the window in which dioxins can reform after they were already destroyed.
Selection
Wet scrubbers spray an alkaline solution, typically sodium hydroxide or lime slurry, through the gas stream. They give the highest acid gas removal and handle high, variable halogen loading well, at the cost of water supply and a liquid effluent that itself needs management.
Dry scrubbers inject powdered lime or sodium bicarbonate into the duct, and the reaction products are collected by the downstream baghouse as a solid. There is no effluent, which is decisive on remote sites and in cold climates. Semi-dry designs sit between the two, trading water use against removal efficiency. The right answer follows the feed chemistry, the halogen loading, the permitted stack limits, and whether the site can accept a liquid stream at all.
Verification
Removal efficiency is established by stack testing under a permitted operating envelope, then held by continuous emissions monitoring that proves the unit stayed inside that envelope for the whole treatment period. Hydrogen chloride, sulfur dioxide, particulate, carbon monoxide, and oxygen are the channels regulators normally want to see.
That record is what closes a file. A treatment program that cannot show the gas train stayed in envelope is exposed no matter how good the destruction efficiency looked on the day of the test.
Specifying the stage
The feed contains chlorinePCBs, chlorinated solvents, and pesticide residues all produce hydrogen chloride on combustion. Acid gas scrubbing is mandatory, and the quench ahead of it has to be fast enough to shut the dioxin reformation window.
The feed contains fluorinePFAS-impacted material produces hydrogen fluoride. Removal and materials of construction both need to be specified for HF, not assumed from an HCl design.
The site cannot take a liquid effluentRemote, Arctic, or water-constrained sites point toward dry or semi-dry scrubbing, where reaction products leave as a solid with the baghouse dust.
Stack limits are tightWhere the permit sets low HCl or SO2 limits, scrubber sizing and reagent stoichiometry drive the design, not the oxidiser rating.
The unit has to mobiliseRoad-transportable emissions control has to be engineered as part of the train. Reagent supply, water supply, effluent handling, and commissioning stack tests all belong in the mobilisation plan.
Project evidence
The Hub
The Hub maps known contamination across North America and sets out the criteria and permitting each jurisdiction applies to thermal treatment.
We'll reply within 1 business day.
Frequently asked
Related