Ask Nelson

Trained on Nelson's 30+ year project history & technical library

Nelson's AI team member

Thermal Remediation

Technology

The thermal oxidiser is where remediation stops moving the problem and starts ending it.

Most published material on thermal oxidisers, spelled thermal oxidizer in North America, treats them as industrial air pollution control equipment for manufacturing exhaust. In contaminated site remediation the oxidiser does something more consequential: it is the single component that determines whether a contaminant is destroyed or merely relocated. This page covers how it works, how it is sized, and how its performance is proven to a regulator.

Where it sits in the treatment train

Desorption releases the contaminant. Oxidation ends it.

In a soil remediation train, contaminated material is heated in a thermal desorption drum until the contaminant volatilizes. At that moment the contaminant has been separated from the soil, but it still exists. It is now a concentrated vapour moving under negative pressure toward the next stage.

The thermal oxidiser receives that vapour and destroys it. Held above its destruction temperature, with excess oxygen and enough turbulence to prevent any portion of the stream from short-circuiting, the organic molecules break apart and reform as carbon dioxide, water, and, where halogens are present, acid gases that the downstream acid gas scrubbing stage captures.

This is why the oxidiser, not the desorber, is the component a technical reviewer should interrogate first. A large desorption drum paired with an undersized secondary combustion chamber produces impressive throughput numbers and incomplete destruction. Throughput is a commercial metric. Destruction efficiency is the environmental one.

The Nelson mobile fleet

Rated to 1,100 °C. Held at setpoint for the contaminant present.

Every Nelson mobile plant is a thermal desorption unit paired with a direct-fired secondary combustion chamber. The oxidiser on each unit is rated to 1,100 °C. The normal operating setpoint for petroleum hydrocarbon soil is 870 °C (1600 °F), which is where the standard block flow and the published destruction figures sit. The setpoint is raised toward the 1,100 °C rating for chlorinated compounds, PCBs, dioxins, and PFAS, where bond energy demands it. Residence time is held at two seconds minimum in every configuration.

Unit

Throughput

Operating envelope

Residence time

RS-945

50 to 70 t/hr

Primary to 500 °C · oxidiser to 1,100 °C

2 sec minimum

RS-45

35 to 50 t/hr

Primary to 500 °C · oxidiser to 1,100 °C

2 sec minimum

RS-40

30 to 45 t/hr

Primary to 500 °C · oxidiser to 1,100 °C

2 sec minimum

RS-20

15 to 25 t/hr

Primary to 500 °C · oxidiser to 1,100 °C

2 sec minimum

Nominal design envelopes. Final operating parameters are fixed at pilot or commissioning against soil moisture, contaminant loading, and the site remediation criteria. Full mobile fleet specifications, including fuel flexibility, mobilisation footprint, and emissions control, are published on the capabilities page.

Where the oxidiser sits in the train

Design fundamentals

Temperature, time, turbulence.

TemperatureSet by the hardest bond on the site. Hydrocarbon vapour is destroyed at 760 to 870 °C. Chlorinated compounds and PCBs need 1,100 °C or above. PFAS requires a sustained band above 1,100 °C because the carbon-fluorine bond is the strongest single bond in organic chemistry. The chamber is designed for the worst case present, never the average.

Residence timeOne to two seconds at temperature for most constituents, with two seconds the standard requirement for PCBs and dioxins. Residence time is a function of chamber volume against gas flow rate, which is why chamber sizing cannot be separated from the desorber's off-gas volume.

TurbulenceAchieved through burner placement, chamber geometry, and induced swirl. Without it, a portion of the gas stream traverses the chamber faster than the design residence time and exits partially treated. Stack testing detects this; nothing upstream will.

Excess oxygenMaintained above stoichiometric requirement and monitored continuously. Oxygen deficiency produces products of incomplete combustion, which are frequently more hazardous than the parent compound.

The thermal oxidiser burner

Turndown ratio is the specification that gets overlooked.

The burner holds the chamber at setpoint and supplies the flame front that drives oxidation. It fires on natural gas, propane, or diesel depending on what the site can supply, which in remote deployment is a logistics decision made months before mobilisation.

The specification that matters most in remediation, and the one least discussed, is turndown ratio. Contaminant loading in the vapour stream is not constant. It rises and falls continuously as the excavation moves through hot spots and clean zones, and as feed moisture varies. A burner with a narrow turndown range either overshoots, wasting fuel and stressing refractory, or drops below setpoint during high-loading periods, which is precisely when destruction efficiency matters most. Wide turndown, tied to real-time chamber thermocouple feedback, is what keeps DRE stable across a working day.

Configurations

Regenerative, recuperative, and direct-fired.

Regenerative thermal oxidiser (RTO)

Exhaust passes through ceramic media beds that store heat and pre-warm the incoming stream, recovering up to 95 percent of thermal energy. Excellent for continuous, clean, predictable industrial exhaust. Rarely the right answer for mobile soil remediation: the beds are heavy to transport, slow to bring to setpoint, and vulnerable to fouling from the particulate and variable moisture that soil treatment inevitably produces.

Recuperative thermal oxidiser

A metallic heat exchanger transfers energy from exhaust to inlet, typically recovering 50 to 70 percent. Lighter and more tolerant of dirty streams than an RTO, but exchanger surfaces still require managed cleaning intervals when chlorides are present.

Direct-fired secondary combustion chamber

No heat recovery in the chamber itself; energy is recovered downstream where the gas is cleaner. Tolerant of particulate, variable moisture, and unpredictable loading, and it reaches setpoint quickly after a shutdown. This is the configuration Nelson uses across the mobile fleet, because remediation off-gas is dirty and variable by nature.

Verification

Destruction that cannot be proven has not been achieved.

Destruction-and-removal efficiency compares the mass of a principal organic hazardous constituent entering the system with the mass leaving in the stack. Regulators commonly require 99.99 percent for hazardous constituents and 99.9999 percent, six nines, for PCBs and dioxins.

DRE is established during commissioning stack testing under a permitted operating envelope: chamber temperature, residence time, oxygen concentration, and feed rate. Once established, continuous emissions monitoring records prove the unit stayed inside that envelope for every hour of treatment. The closure package a regulator receives is the stack test plus the CEMS record plus the treated-soil confirmation sampling, submitted together.

One detail decides more stack tests than any other: the quench rate. Chlorinated compounds can reform dioxins during slow cooling between roughly 400 and 200 degrees Celsius. A correctly performing oxidiser followed by a slow quench will still fail. Rapid quench through that window is a design requirement, not an optimisation.

In the field

High-temperature destruction, verified on site.

Vietnam, legacy dioxin residuesIndirect thermal desorption paired with high-temperature secondary combustion, the configuration and quench design that dioxin destruction requires.

NATO PFAS, mobile high-temperature destructionSustained above-1,100 °C vapour-phase destruction sized to AFFF-driven contamination profiles on military-base soil.

Tioga, North Dakota, anatomy of a cleanup1.2 million tonne pipeline release treated on site at scale, with verified DRE and complete regulatory closure.

American Samoa, AUA Tank Farm22,400 tons of hydrocarbon-impacted soil treated in a remote island deployment with ERRG and USACE, oxidiser held at setpoint through continuous day and night operations.

See the full mobile fleet and process flow

Where this sits

Thermal oxidation is one step inside a delivered remedy

This page explains the method. The contaminant pages set out what the regulator expects for a specific problem, and the capabilities overview sets out the plant, crew, throughput, and verification behind the work on site.

See Nelson capabilities

Discuss your site

Back to the problem

Dioxins and furansVapour-phase destruction requirements and the stack evidence a regulator expects.

PCBsDestruction and removal efficiency against a principal organic hazardous constituent.

HydrocarbonsWhere oxidation sits downstream of desorption on a production hydrocarbon site.

Talk to the contractor

Scoping a thermal oxidiser project?

Tell us four things about the site and a Nelson thermal specialist will come back with an honest read on treatability, throughput, and whether our mobile fleet is the right fit. No obligation, and no pressure if it is not.

Frequently asked

What is a thermal oxidiser?
A thermal oxidiser is a combustion device that destroys organic compounds in a gas stream by holding them at high temperature, with sufficient oxygen and turbulence, for a defined residence time. In a remediation treatment train it sits immediately downstream of the thermal desorption unit and receives the contaminant-laden vapour driven off the soil. It is the component that converts contaminant removal into contaminant destruction.
Is a thermal oxidiser the same as a thermal oxidizer?
Yes. Thermal oxidiser is the British and Commonwealth spelling and thermal oxidizer is the American spelling. They describe the same equipment. The terms afterburner, secondary combustion chamber, and SCC are also used interchangeably in remediation practice, though afterburner more often refers to the chamber itself and thermal oxidiser to the complete unit including burner and controls.
What are the three T's of thermal oxidation?
Temperature, time, and turbulence. Destruction efficiency depends on holding the gas above its destruction temperature (temperature), for long enough to complete the reaction (residence time, typically one to two seconds), while mixing thoroughly enough that no portion of the stream short-circuits the chamber (turbulence). Failure of any one of the three produces incomplete destruction regardless of how well the other two perform.
What temperature does a thermal oxidiser chamber operate at?
Ordinary hydrocarbon vapour is destroyed at 760 to 870 degrees Celsius. Chlorinated compounds including PCBs require 1,100 degrees or higher with at least two seconds residence time to prevent dioxin reformation in the cooling zone. PFAS demands the highest sustained band, above 1,100 degrees, because the carbon-fluorine bond is the strongest single bond in organic chemistry. The chamber is sized for the worst-case contaminant on the site, not the average.
How does a thermal oxidiser burner work?
The burner establishes and holds the chamber at setpoint, firing on natural gas, propane, or diesel depending on site supply. It does two jobs at once: it supplies the heat that raises incoming vapour to destruction temperature, and it provides the flame front and excess oxygen that drive the oxidation reaction. Burner turndown ratio matters in remediation because contaminant loading in the vapour stream varies continuously as feed material changes through the day.
What is a regenerative thermal oxidiser and does remediation use one?
A regenerative thermal oxidiser, or RTO, passes exhaust gas through ceramic media beds that store heat and pre-warm the incoming stream, recovering up to 95 percent of the thermal energy. RTOs are highly efficient for continuous, predictable industrial exhaust. They are less common in mobile soil remediation because the media beds are heavy, slow to reach setpoint, and vulnerable to fouling from the particulate and variable moisture that soil treatment produces. Mobile remediation generally uses a direct-fired oxidiser with heat recovery elsewhere in the train.
How is destruction efficiency measured?
By destruction-and-removal efficiency, or DRE, calculated as the mass of a principal organic hazardous constituent entering the system against the mass leaving in the stack. Regulators typically require 99.99 percent for hazardous constituents and 99.9999 percent, six nines, for PCBs and dioxins. DRE is established by stack testing under a permitted operating envelope, then maintained by continuous emissions monitoring that proves the unit stayed inside that envelope for the whole treatment period.
What emissions controls follow the oxidiser?
A quench to drop gas temperature rapidly through the dioxin reformation window, acid gas scrubbing where chlorinated or fluorinated compounds are present, and a baghouse for particulate. Rapid quench matters more than most specifications acknowledge: chlorinated compounds can reform dioxins during slow cooling between roughly 400 and 200 degrees Celsius, which will show up in stack testing as a failure the oxidiser itself did not cause.
Can a thermal oxidiser be mobilised to a remote site?
Yes. Nelson's secondary combustion chambers are engineered as road-transportable modules that pair with the mobile desorption fleet and have been deployed in the Canadian Arctic, on Pacific islands, and in tropical Southeast Asia. Mobilisation planning covers fuel supply, permitting, stack height requirements, and commissioning stack tests before treatment begins.

Related

Thermal Desorption, the process

Thermal Remediation Services

Capabilities, full mobile fleet & process

PFAS Destruction Technologies Compared

More from Nelson

  • Mobile thermal technology: configured for the material, brought to site
  • How to use The Hub for contamination research
  • Navigator: a practical guide to remediation strategy
  • The Ground Truth: Warren Nelson's remediation newsletter
  • A new era of enlightenment
  • Value should be the final outcome
  • What’s next at Nelson
  • Why independent research matters more than anything
  • Over thirty years of permanent outcomes: a field review of Nelson’s project record
  • Petroleum-contaminated soil treatment in the US: build the plan around the fuel profile
  • Contaminated soil management in the US: from excavation to an accepted destination
  • US remediation project evidence: what Tioga and Honolulu tell a project owner

Site Navigation

  • All Articles & Research
  • Thermal Remediation Capabilities
  • Project Case Studies
  • Remediation Glossary
  • About Nelson Environmental Remediation
  • Contact Nelson