PFAS contamination map

PFAS in Massachusetts drinking water

Every Massachusetts public water system that reported a PFAS detection during EPA UCMR 5 monitoring, how many sit above the 2024 federal limits, and the standard Massachusetts applies. Concentrations are in nanograms per litre, the same unit as parts per trillion.

This is the United States view of the North American PFAS dataset. The complete dataset, including all 3,452 US systems and 97 Canadian sites, lives on the main PFAS contamination map.

Systems reporting a PFAS detection
141
Systems above a 2024 federal limit
104
Systems above the mixture Hazard Index
3
Large systems in the results
93

What Massachusetts requires

State enforceable standard

Agency
Massachusetts DEP
Citation
310 CMR 22.07G, PFAS6 MCL
Effective
2020-10-02

Among the strictest US enforceable MCLs; extensive PWS compliance sampling since 2021.

Compound

Limit (ng/L)

Note

Sum of 6 PFAS (PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA, PFHpA, PFDA)

20

Enforceable MCL

Citations

MassDEP, PFAS

US EPA PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (2024)

US EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data

Last reviewed 2026-08-13. Verify against the agency source before making a compliance or remediation decision.

Full Massachusetts regulatory brief

All US state limits

Massachusetts systems with the highest reported results

Ranked by how far the worst single compound sits above its 2024 federal limit. Values are the maximum each system reported during its UCMR 5 monitoring period.

Water system

PWSID

Worst compound

Max ng/L

Times the limit

Raynham Center Water District

MA4245000

PFOA

92

23.0x

Dartmouth Water Division

MA4072000

PFOS

50.6

12.7x

Natick Water Department

MA3198000

PFOS

37.3

9.3x

Duxbury Water Department

MA4082000

PFOS

35

8.8x

Norwell Water Department

MA4219000

PFOS

18.4

4.6x

Easton Water Div

MA4088000

PFOS

16.3

4.1x

Aquarion Water Company, Millbury

MA2186000

PFOA

15.8

4.0x

Sharon Water Dept

MA4266000

PFOS

15

3.8x

Acton Water Supply District

MA2002000

PFOA

13.4

3.4x

Randolph Water Department

MA4244000

PFOS

13

3.3x

Manchester By The Sea Dpw

MA3166000

PFOA

12

3.0x

Abington/Rockland Joint Wtr. Works

MA4001000

PFOA

12

3.0x

Attleboro Water Dept

MA4016000

PFOS

12

3.0x

Holbrook Public Works Dept

MA4133000

PFOS

11.9

3.0x

Pepperell Dpw Water Division

MA2232000

PFOA

11.4

2.9x

Hanover Water Dept, Ma

MA4122000

PFOS

11.4

2.9x

Hamilton Water Dept

MA3119000

PFOS

11.2

2.8x

Middleborough Water Supply

MA4182000

PFOA

11

2.8x

Sudbury Water District

MA3288000

PFOA

9

2.3x

Topsfield Water Department

MA3298000

PFOA

9

2.3x

Open the full map and filter Massachusetts pins

Where the numbers on this page come from

Every count above is read straight from a published government file. Nothing is modelled, averaged, or estimated. The rules below are the exact rules used to produce the figures for Massachusetts.

Dataset used for the system counts

Source
US EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 5 (UCMR 5) public occurrence data, January 2026 release
File
UCMR5_All.txt, the full public results file released by EPA
Extracted
2026-08-13
Units
Nanograms per litre, equivalent to parts per trillion. EPA publishes micrograms per litre and those values are multiplied by 1,000.

Open the EPA source page

Coverage rules that decide what is counted for Massachusetts

Who is in UCMR 5. All public water systems serving more than 3,300 people, plus a national sample of 800 smaller systems. Private wells and most small systems are not monitored, so they cannot appear here.

Which systems are listed. Only systems whose state field is MA and that reported at least one measured PFAS detection. Systems that monitored and found nothing are not shown, and their absence is not evidence of contamination. That gives 141 systems in Massachusetts.

Systems that cannot be placed. 87 systems nationally reported a detection but have no serviced ZIP code published by EPA, so they carry no location and are excluded from these counts. National totals on the map page include them.

Which value is used. The highest result a system reported for each compound across its sampling events. Results flagged by EPA as non-detects are excluded, as are the lithium results carried in the same file.

The above a limit count. A system is counted when its maximum result for a compound exceeds the 2024 federal Maximum Contaminant Level: 4 ng/L for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ng/L for PFHxS, PFNA, and HFPO-DA. That is 104 systems in Massachusetts.

The Hazard Index count. Calculated with EPA's own mixture method for PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA, and PFBS. A system is counted when the index is above 1. That is 3 systems in Massachusetts.

What monitoring data is not. Exceeding a 2024 limit in this dataset is not a compliance violation. The federal limits carry a 2029 compliance date, which EPA proposed on 18 May 2026 to move to 2031 for PFOA and PFOS in a rule that is not final, and treatment may have been installed since the sample was taken.

If any figure on this page does not match its source file, tell Nelson and it will be corrected or removed.

Other states and territories

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

District of Columbia

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Contact

How can we help?

Project inquiries, technical consultation, or emergencies.

We respond to project inquiries within one business day.

Nelson Environmental Remediation

Head Office

30541 - 100 Avenue

Acheson (Edmonton), Alberta

Canada T7X 6L8

Phone

1.780.960.3660

Toll Free: 1.888.960.8222

Fax

1.780.962.6885

Email

Follow Us on LinkedIn →

More from Nelson

  • Mobile thermal technology: configured for the material, brought to site
  • How to use The Hub for contamination research
  • Navigator: a practical guide to remediation strategy
  • The Ground Truth: Warren Nelson's remediation newsletter
  • A new era of enlightenment
  • Value should be the final outcome
  • What’s next at Nelson
  • Why independent research matters more than anything
  • Over thirty years of permanent outcomes: a field review of Nelson’s project record
  • Petroleum-contaminated soil treatment in the US: build the plan around the fuel profile
  • Contaminated soil management in the US: from excavation to an accepted destination
  • US remediation project evidence: what Tioga and Honolulu tell a project owner

Site Navigation

  • All Articles & Research
  • Thermal Remediation Capabilities
  • Project Case Studies
  • Remediation Glossary
  • About Nelson Environmental Remediation
  • Contact Nelson