PFAS in North Carolina drinking water

Every North Carolina public water system that reported a PFAS detection during EPA UCMR 5 monitoring, how many sit above the 2024 federal limits, and the standard North Carolina applies. Concentrations are in nanograms per litre, the same unit as parts per trillion.

This is the United States view of the North American PFAS dataset. The complete dataset, including all 3,452 US systems and 97 Canadian sites, lives on the main PFAS contamination map.

Loading federal sample results

What North Carolina requires

Guidance value only

Agency

North Carolina DEQ

Citation

Consent Order w/ Chemours; provisional health goals

Effective

2019-02-25

North Carolina has no state MCL. The GenX figure is the NCDHHS health goal set in July 2017, and the 70 ng/L figures reflect the superseded 2016 federal health advisory used as a reference point. The Chemours consent order is enforceable against Chemours rather than a general drinking water standard.

Compound

Limit (ng/L)

Note

HFPO-DA (GenX)

140

NCDHHS health goal, July 2017

PFOA

Reference to the 2016 EPA lifetime health advisory

PFOS

Reference to the 2016 EPA lifetime health advisory

Citations

NCDEQ, GenX / Chemours

US EPA PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (2024)

US EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data

Last reviewed 2026-08-13. Verify against the agency source before making a compliance or remediation decision.

Full North Carolina regulatory brief

All US state limits

Where the numbers on this page come from

Every count above is read straight from a published government file. Nothing is modelled, averaged, or estimated. The rules below are the exact rules used to produce the figures for North Carolina.

Dataset used for the system counts

Source

US EPA, Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5), public occurrence data

File

UCMR5_All.txt, the full public results file released by EPA

Extracted

2026-08-13

Units

Nanograms per litre, equivalent to parts per trillion. EPA publishes micrograms per litre and those values are multiplied by 1,000.

Coverage rules that decide what is counted for North Carolina

Who is in UCMR 5. All public water systems serving more than 3,300 people, plus a national sample of 800 smaller systems. Private wells and most small systems are not monitored, so they cannot appear here.

Which systems are listed. Only systems whose state field is NC and that reported at least one measured PFAS detection. Systems that monitored and found nothing are not shown, and their absence is not evidence of contamination.

Systems that cannot be placed. 87 systems nationally reported a detection but have no serviced ZIP code published by EPA, so they carry no location and are excluded from these counts. National totals on the map page include them.

Which value is used. The highest result a system reported for each compound across its sampling events. Results flagged by EPA as non-detects are excluded, as are the lithium results carried in the same file.

The above a limit count. A system is counted when its maximum result for a compound exceeds the 2024 federal Maximum Contaminant Level: 4 ng/L for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ng/L for PFHxS, PFNA, and HFPO-DA.

The Hazard Index count. Calculated with EPA's own mixture method for PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA, and PFBS. A system is counted when the index is above 1.

What monitoring data is not. Exceeding a 2024 limit in this dataset is not a compliance violation. The federal limits carry a 2029 compliance date, which EPA proposed on 18 May 2026 to move to 2031 for PFOA and PFOS in a rule that is not final, and treatment may have been installed since the sample was taken.

If any figure on this page does not match its source file, tell Nelson and it will be corrected or removed.